Hello Local 3782 Union Members,

On Thursday, July 7, 2011, we held our membership meeting at our new location (a huge improvement over our former location and quite a bit less expensive). We provided food and beverages as well as an update regarding our recent meeting with management.

For those of you who could not attend the meeting, here’s a brief summary of what we discussed:

Recently, we were approached by management about the budget crunch and how the ARC of Monmouth would be affected by it. They asked us to consider concessions regarding compensation.

First they asked if we would consider putting off our raise for the fiscal year July 2011 – June 2012. Their alternative proposal was for a wage freeze and contract extension in the following year. After some discussion at our July 7th membership meeting, our reply to management was that after careful consideration, we do not believe our membership would vote to accept that.

We may continue to meet with management on this issue but rest assured that we will bring you the information on any concessions we feel have merit so that you can decide whether or not to accept them.

We thank those members who took the time (we realize not everyone had the ability to attend the meeting) to attend our July 7th meeting. We will try to meet again very soon.

Most of all, we thank you for your support and understanding. We will continue to work hard to protect and improve our contract in every way possible.

Jessie Merritt, President Local 3782 MORE

Please click on the Title above to download the H1N1 FAQs.

MORE

Please click on the Title above to download the FAQs.

MORE

One of the most vital functions of a Union is to prevent management from intimidating employees.  Nowhere is this more important than in closed-door meetings when supervisors attempt to coerce employees into a confession of wrongdoing.

The right of employees to have the presence of union representatives during investigatory interviews was announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1975 in NLRB vs. J. Weingarten, Inc.  Since that case involved a clerk being investigated by the Weingarten Company, these rights have become known as the Weingarten rights.

Unions should encourage workers to assert their Weingarten rights.  The presence of a union representative can help in many ways.  For example:

v     They can help a fearful or inarticulate employee explain what happened.

v     They can raise extenuating factors.

v     They can advise an employee against blindly denying everything, thereby giving the appearance of dishonesty and guilt.

v     They can help prevent an employee from making fatal admissions.

v     They can stop an employee from losing his or her temper, and perhaps getting fired for insubordination.

v     They can serve as a witness to prevent supervisors from giving a false account of the conversation.

WEINGARTEN RULES

Under the Supreme Court’s Weingarten decision, when an investigatory interview occurs, the following rules apply:

RULE 1:   The employee must make a clear request for union representation before or during the interview.  The employee cannot be punished for making this request.

RULE 2:   After the employee makes the request, the employer must choose from among three options.  The employer must either:

1. Grant the request and delay questioning until the union representative arrives and has a chance to consult privately with the employee; or
2. Deny the request and end the interview immediately; or
3. Give the employee a choice of:

1.      having the interview without representation; or

2.      ending the interview.

RULE 3:   If the employer denies a request for union representation, and continues to ask questions, they have committed an unfair labor practice and the employee has a right to refuse to answer.  The employer may not discipline the employee for such a refusal.

MORE